Second, the regime created the tools for people to criticize itself, which shows that it misunderstood its own society. ![]() ![]() First, the historiographical engineering that the New Order committed was not effective. Part Three ends with several concluding observations. Part Two examines the genealogy of and the major issues at stake in the post-New Order controversy over the rectification of history. Part One presents the author’s intellectual autobiography, which illustrates how, as a member of the generation of people who grew up in the New Order, he came into contact with history. Proceeding in chronological and thematic manner, the thesis comes in three parts. This thesis discusses one central problem: What happened to Indonesian historiography in the New Order (1966-98)? To analyze the problem, the author studies the connections between the major themes in his intellectual autobiography and those in the metahistory of the regime.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |